<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paging Dr. Thornton &#187; Pregnancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pagingdrthornton.com/topics/pregnancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:14:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Baby&#8217;s tastebuds mirror Mom&#8217;s food choices?</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/30/babys-tastebuds-mirror-moms-food-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/30/babys-tastebuds-mirror-moms-food-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby's tastebuds influenced by what mom eats when pregnant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably heard the claim that exposing a baby in the womb to Mozart will increase his or her IQ. Despite the hype, the research doesn&#8217;t support major leaps in smarts (but, if nothing else, it might improve your child&#8217;s musical taste, later on). Now, there&#8217;s some evidence showing that you may be able to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-babies-ex" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-babies-ex&amp;referer=');">claim that exposing a baby in the womb to Mozart will increase his or her IQ</a>. Despite the hype, the research doesn&#8217;t support major leaps in smarts (but, if nothing else, it might improve your child&#8217;s musical taste, later on).</p>
<p>Now, there&#8217;s some evidence showing that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/a-mothers-food-choice-can-shape-babys-palate-research-shows/2011/11/17/gIQAqcYooN_story.html?wprss&amp;google_editors_picks=true" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/a-mothers-food-choice-can-shape-babys-palate-research-shows/2011/11/17/gIQAqcYooN_story.html?wprss_amp_google_editors_picks=true&amp;referer=');">you may be able to shape a yet-to-be-born child&#8217;s taste in food</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The flavor and odors of what mothers eat show up in the amniotic fluid, which is swallowed by the fetus, and in breast milk. There is evidence that fetal taste buds are mature in utero by 13 to 15 weeks, with taste receptor cells appearing at 16 weeks, according to researchers.</em></p>
<p><em>“&#8217;With flavor learning, you can train a baby’s palate with repetitive exposure,” said Kim Trout, director of the nurse midwifery/women’s health nurse practitioner program at Georgetown University.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Trout recently co-authored a paper that reviews the evidence on prenatal flavor learning and its implications for controlling childhood obesity and diabetes, among the country’s most pressing health problems&#8230;&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m just as skeptical of this claim as I am about the one for baby-and-Mozart, I see real benefit in giving this a try, whether it makes your baby want broccoli or not. That&#8217;s because, in my practice, I see too many women gaining too much weight during pregnancy, which can not only cause complications for mother and baby, but can be almost impossible to shed once your baby is born.</p>
<p>So, bring on the Brussels sprouts, and eschew the Twinkies. Pass by the apple pie and bite into a nice juicy apple instead. Whether it does a thing to change your baby&#8217;s mind about what tastes good later in life, it will do a world of good for you both right now.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-789"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/30/babys-tastebuds-mirror-moms-food-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you be worried about the blot clot risk with newer birth control pills?</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/21/worried-blot-clot-risk-newer-birth-control-pills/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/21/worried-blot-clot-risk-newer-birth-control-pills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contraception (birth control)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility & Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control pills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood clots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood clots in pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks of contraceptives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yasmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YAZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have read the news that YAZ and Yasmin, two newer birth control pills, are riskier to take than older contraceptives due to higher potential for blood clot formation. But it&#8217;s important to put this into perspective. No matter what birth control pill you use, blood clots are a possibility, if an uncommon one. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have read the news that YAZ and Yasmin, two newer birth control pills, are riskier to take than older contraceptives due to <a title="Newer birth control pills and blood clots" href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/study-yaz-has-higher-risks-of-blood-clots/" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/study-yaz-has-higher-risks-of-blood-clots/?referer=');">higher potential for blood clot formation.</a></p>
<p>But it&#8217;s important to put this into perspective. No matter what birth control pill you use, blood clots are a possibility, if an uncommon one. What you might not know is that blood clots are even more common in pregnancy. Fortunately, the vast majority of the millions of women who get pregnant and give birth each year don&#8217;t suffer blood clots. Just as millions of women take birth control pills with no such side effects.</p>
<p>So, is there a unique problem with YAZ? Yes, but not the one identified in the headlines. The problem is in the marketing.</p>
<p>YAZ was promoted to women as a pill for bloating and acne in addition to its contraceptive effects. While that might be a good marketing strategy, it&#8217;s not a good medical one. Contraceptives are for birth control, and the best one for you, based on your medical history, might have nothing to do with acne. People shouldn&#8217;t pick their birth control the way they pick their toothpaste—on the basis of consumer advertising. You should consult your doctor who will look at your history and decide what form of contraception meets your needs. If your family has a history of strokes, blood clots, or thrombophlebitis (a blood clot that causes swelling in a vein), your doctor will almost certainly order advanced testing due to the possibility that any birth control pill—YAZ, Yasmin, or older medicines—might be inappropriate for your condition.</p>
<p>But if your doctor has already determined that YAZ or Yasmin is a safe bet, and you&#8217;re on one of these now? Keep taking it unless your doctor says otherwise. The alternative could be unintended pregnancy. And pregnancy, ironically enough, is more likely to cause a blood clot than your birth control pills.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-778"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/11/21/worried-blot-clot-risk-newer-birth-control-pills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are what you eat&#8230;and so is your baby</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/10/20/eat-and-baby/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/10/20/eat-and-baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childbirth & delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve all been told how important it is to eat well in order to stay healthy. Now, new research shows that what you eat when you&#8217;re pregnant can be as important for your baby as it is for you. A study published in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine shows that when mothers-to-be ate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve all been told how important it is to eat well in order to stay healthy. Now, new research shows that what you eat when you&#8217;re pregnant can be as important for your baby as it is for you.</p>
<p>A study published in the <em>Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine</em> shows that when mothers-to-be ate healthful foods, such as those that make up the so-called Mediterranean diet, their <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/03/health/healthy-diet-birth-defects/" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.cnn.com/2011/10/03/health/healthy-diet-birth-defects/?referer=');">babies had fewer birth defects</a> such as cleft palates and neural tube defects.</p>
<p>The Mediterranean diet focuses on vegetables, beans, fruits, grains and fish, and is lower in meat, dairy and &#8220;empty&#8221; carbs.</p>
<p>Before you panic if you&#8217;re reading this while gorging on burgers and fries, no, your baby isn&#8217;t going to be born with birth defects just because you&#8217;re taking a vacation from your diet. The birth defects researchers looked at in the study are quite rare to begin with. It&#8217;s just that they are rarer still among women who eat well.</p>
<p>But the study does hint at something we know: your baby&#8217;s development depends, in part, on the nutrients you consume. So, give your little one a head-start on a good future. You&#8217;ll be doing a favor for both of you.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-765"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/10/20/eat-and-baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning Your Baby’s Gender at Seven Weeks –Test is Mixed Blessing</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/08/16/learning-baby%e2%80%99s-gender-weeks-%e2%80%93test-mixed-blessing/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/08/16/learning-baby%e2%80%99s-gender-weeks-%e2%80%93test-mixed-blessing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childbirth & delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias against female babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetal testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For parents-to-be, impatient to know whether to paint the nursery blue or pink, a simple test can provide answers as early as seven weeks into the pregnancy.  These tests have been available for some time but weren’t widely used in the U.S., because their accuracy wasn’t known. Now, The New York Times reports, a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For parents-to-be, impatient to know whether to paint the nursery blue or pink, a simple test can provide answers as early as seven weeks into the pregnancy.  These tests have been available for some time but weren’t widely used in the U.S., because their accuracy wasn’t known. Now, <em>The New York Times</em> reports, <a title="Study says test effective at determining fetus's gender at 7 weeks" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/health/10birth.html" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/health/10birth.html?referer=');">a new study in <em>The Journal of the American Medical Association</em></a>, has “found that carefully conducted tests could determine sex with accuracy of 95 percent at 7 weeks to 99 percent at 20 weeks.”</p>
<p>But is it really necessary to know your baby’s sex that early? For some parents, it can be.  The Times reports that European doctors routinely use such tests to:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>… help expectant parents whose offspring are at risk for rare gender-linked disorders determine whether they need invasive and costly genetic testing. For example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy affects boys, but if the fetus is not the at-risk sex, such tests are unnecessary.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>But the big downside, and one that concerns me greatly as a doctor and a mother, is that some cultures have such a bias against baby girls that the wide availability of such testing will result in ever more otherwise healthy female fetuses being aborted.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Several companies do not sell tests in China or India, where boys are prized over girls and fetuses found to be female have been aborted. While sex selection is not considered a widespread objective in the United States, companies say that occasionally customers expressed that interest, and have been denied the test. A recent study of third pregnancies in the journal Prenatal Diagnosis found that in some Asian-American groups, more boys than girls are born in ratios that are “strongly suggesting prenatal sex selection,” the authors said.</em><br />
<em>At least one company, Consumer Genetics, which sells the Pink or Blue test, requires customers to sign a waiver saying they are not using the test for that purpose. “We don’t want this technology to be used as a method of gender selection,” said the company’s executive vice president, Terry Carmichael.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Cultural preferences won’t be deterred by a signature on a form, but at least, it’s a start. At some point, all cultures will learn to value both genders equally. Until then, a test that holds promise for some, can be a terrible incentive for the ultimate act of bias against females in others.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-756"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/08/16/learning-baby%e2%80%99s-gender-weeks-%e2%80%93test-mixed-blessing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug Maker Attempted to Capitalize on the Lives of Infants</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/04/05/drug-maker-attempted-capitalize-lives-infants/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/04/05/drug-maker-attempted-capitalize-lives-infants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childbirth & delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug maker price gouging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroxyprogesterone caproate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makeena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMFM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a synthetic form of progestin called hydroxyprogesterone caproate, or 17P, that is used to prevent mothers-to-be from delivering prematurely. Treating a mother at risk of having a preemie with hydroxyprogesterone caproate was found, in tax-payer funded studies by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, to reduce the incidence of pre-term [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a synthetic form of progestin called hydroxyprogesterone caproate, or 17P, that is used to prevent mothers-to-be from delivering prematurely. Treating a mother at risk of having a preemie with hydroxyprogesterone caproate was found, in tax-payer funded studies by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, to reduce the incidence of pre-term births, which naturally means that babies suffer fewer of the complications that plague preeemies. The studies also found that giving this drug to mothers-to-be at risk of premature delivery could save the health care system at least $2billion per year.</p>
<p>Until recently, the drug had been available only through “compounding pharmacies” (pharmacies that formulate drugs that aren’t commercially available), at a cost of about $10 to $20 per dose. But the FDA recently licensed one manufacturer, KV Pharmaceuticals, to manufacture the drug commercially, and exclusively, for the next seven years.</p>
<p>What usually happens at the point where a manufacturer is given exclusive rights to market a drug is that compounding pharmacies are told that they may no longer produce the drug.</p>
<p>And that would have happened this time – if KV Pharmaceuticals hadn’t done something that has caused <a title="Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine decries drugmaker's pricing on Makeena" href="http://www.smfmnewsroom.org/?page_id=95" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.smfmnewsroom.org/?page_id=95&amp;referer=');">a huge uproar in the maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics community</a>. It raised the price of the drug from the $10 to $20 per dose that compounding pharmacies had been charging to (are you sitting down?) $1,500 per dose.</p>
<p>No, that’s not a typo.</p>
<p>They raised the price by an average of 100 times what it had been.</p>
<p>Remember, it was tax-payer dollars that funded much of the research, so the raise in price could not be attributed simply to recouping research costs. And driving the price that high would put it out of reach of most women (and babies) who needed it. A full course of the drug, given between the 16th and 36th weeks of pregnancy, had previously cost about $400. The price increase would push that cost to $30,000!</p>
<p>This story, at least, has a happy ending. Although, according to this article in the Seattle Times,<a title="Drugmaker drops price of Makeena-still way too high" href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2014663656_preemydrug02.html" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2014663656_preemydrug02.html?referer=');"> KV Pharmaceuticals agreed  to drop the price to $690 per dose</a> (still outrageously high, in the opinion of most in the obstetrics community), the FDA decided to <a title="FDA: compounding pharmacies may still formulate Makeena" href="http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm249025.htm" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm249025.htm?referer=');">allow compounding pharmacies to continue to formulate the drug </a>when presented with a prescription.</p>
<p>But just imagine all the mothers and babies who would have suffered had the FDA allowed KV to put profits ahead of all else, and ordered compounding pharmacies to cease formulating the prescription.</p>
<p>As a maternal-fetal specialist and a mother, it sends shivers up my spine.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-686"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/04/05/drug-maker-attempted-capitalize-lives-infants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moms-to-be: A New Warning Against Smoking</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/07/moms-to-be-warning-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/07/moms-to-be-warning-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC study on smoking and pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Yvonne S. Thornton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health risks to babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking and birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking and pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study by the CDC, appearing in the journal Pediatrics shows, once again, that smoking cigarettes during pregnancy (with its nicotine and other toxic substances) is a health risk to your baby. Reuters Health reports: …women who smoked early in pregnancy were 30 percent more likely to give birth to babies with obstructions in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A study by the CDC, appearing in the journal <em>Pediatrics</em> shows, once again, that smoking cigarettes during pregnancy (with its nicotine and other toxic substances) is a health risk to your baby. <a title="Mom's smoking increases birth defects" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/03/us-moms-smoking-ups-risk-heart-defects-b-idUSTRE7226A020110303" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/03/us-moms-smoking-ups-risk-heart-defects-b-idUSTRE7226A020110303?referer=');">Reuters Health reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>…women who smoked early in pregnancy were 30 percent more likely to give birth to babies with obstructions in the flow of blood from the heart to the lungs, and nearly 40 percent more likely to have babies with openings in the upper chambers of their hearts. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>We’ve known for many years of the dangers of smoking during pregnancy, and this study just adds to that knowledge. Mothers-to-be take note: what goes into your body affects your baby—possibly for a lifetime.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-671"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/07/moms-to-be-warning-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Latest News From the CDC on Birth Defect Risks</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/05/latest-news-cdc-birth-defect-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/05/latest-news-cdc-birth-defect-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opioids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a report published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) [] warned against using prescription opiate-based painkillers such as codeine, hydrocodone or oxycodone (brand names include Vicodin and Oxycontin) during pregnancy. According to an article about the CDC report: In the study of data from 10 states, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a report published in the <a title="CDC report about birth defects and opioid drugs" href="http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2810%2902524-X/abstract " target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378_2810_2902524-X/abstract?referer=');"><em>American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</em></a>, the <a title="CDC on birth defects and opioid drugs" href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/features/birthdefects-Opioid-Analgesics-keyfindings.html " target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/features/birthdefects-Opioid-Analgesics-keyfindings.html?referer=');">Centers for Disease Control (CDC)</a> [] warned against using prescription opiate-based painkillers such as codeine, hydrocodone or oxycodone (brand names include Vicodin and Oxycontin) during pregnancy.</p>
<p>According to an <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/650507.html" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/650507.html?referer=');">article about the CDC report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>In the study of data from 10 states, the CDC researchers found that 2 percent to 3 percent of mothers interviewed received prescription opioid pain killers, or analgesics, just before they got pregnant or early in their pregnancy. Any illicit use of painkillers was not assessed.</em></p>
<p><em>For those women, the risk of having a baby with hypoplastic left heart syndrome &#8212; a critical heart defect &#8212; was about double that of women who took no opioid drugs.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Risks of other birth defects, including spina bifida (a type of neural tube defect), hydrocephaly (build up of fluid in the brain), congenital glaucoma (eye defect), and gastroschisis (a defect of the abdominal wall), also somewhat increased among babies whose mothers took these drugs either shortly before or during pregnancy.</p>
<p>I have concerns about the generalization of both articles, but the conclusions may be valid. Taking a drug before you’re pregnant, or up to 17 days after conception, is unlikely to cause birth defects. It will either cause a miscarriage or will have no effect. But because most women don’t know precisely when they conceived, it’s best to avoid taking drugs at any time during pregnancy.</p>
<p>The greatest risk to a developing baby from a pregnant mother taking potentially toxic drugs occurs between 17 days post-conception to 12 weeks (end of the first trimester).</p>
<p>You’ve probably heard of Thalidomide, a sedative given in the 1950s to pregnant women in their first trimester. It dramatically illustrated the risks to a fetus’s development from drug effects during the critical first weeks. Thalidomide given early in pregnancy stunted the development of babies’ arms, legs, hands and feet, and caused other limb deformities.</p>
<p>If you’re pregnant, or planning to be, you should also be aware that most drugs, whether prescription or over-the-counter can have unknown effects on a growing fetus. The bottom line is: Every drug is, in some sense, a poison. Don’t consider any drug safe in pregnancy unless prescribed by someone who knows its toxicity as well as the risks and benefits of the drug.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-666"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2011/03/05/latest-news-cdc-birth-defect-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to Deliver? Mother Nature Knows Best</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/12/30/time-deliver-mother-nature/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/12/30/time-deliver-mother-nature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childbirth & delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your newborn baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c-section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesareans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elective cesarean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetal development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstetrician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yvonne S. Thornton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, I’ve been sounding the alarm about Cesarean delivery on-demand, and have persuaded my patients that childbirth isn’t something you can simply pencil into your schedule when convenient. It’s not just that a baby needs all the time nature gives her within the womb to develop, and that delivering just a few days early [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years,<a href="http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/05/27/why-is-the-maternal-mortality-rate-in-the-u-s-so-high/" target="_blank"> I’ve been sounding the alarm about Cesarean delivery on-demand</a>, and have persuaded my patients that childbirth isn’t something you can simply pencil into your schedule when convenient. It’s not just that a baby needs all the time nature gives her within the womb to develop, and that delivering just a few days early can mean that lung development and other functions may be potentially compromised. Cesareans are major surgery, which brings inherent danger to both mom and newborn. Necessary Cesareans are often life-savers. Unnecessary Cesareans can be just the opposite.</p>
<p>And now, at last, the word is spreading.</p>
<p>The San Jose Mercury News <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_16943085?nclick_check=1" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_16943085?nclick_check=1&amp;referer=');">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><br />
Babies born early through induction or C-section without a medical reason are nearly twice as likely to spend time in the neonatal intensive care unit, researchers say. They also are more likely to contract infections and need breathing machines, according to a 2009 study in the New England Journal of Medicine and a number of other reports.</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We are finding out that the last weeks of pregnancy really do count,&#8221; said Leslie Kowalewski, an associate state director for the March of Dimes.</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;At 35 weeks, the brain is only two-thirds of what it will weigh at 40 weeks.&#8221; Many organizations are responding with programs designed to eliminate early elective deliveries. Most significantly, chapters of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have begun to notify doctors about the serious consequences of performing early elective births.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>With luck, as information about potential consequences spreads, expectant mothers and their doctors will decide to let nature take her course, for the sake of the mom’s health and her baby’s.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-611"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/12/30/time-deliver-mother-nature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overweight or Obese? Don’t Count On Your Birth Control Pills.</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/07/14/overweight-or-obese-don%e2%80%99t-count-on-your-birth-control-pills/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/07/14/overweight-or-obese-don%e2%80%99t-count-on-your-birth-control-pills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contraception (birth control)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility & Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control pills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity in pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the pill first appeared on the scene, about 50 years ago, women have felt secure knowing that they had an almost foolproof way to avoid unwanted pregnancies. And that’s been mostly true. But maybe not for all women. If you’re overweight or obese, recent studies suggest that birth control pills might not be as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the pill first appeared on the scene, about 50 years ago, women have felt secure knowing that they had an almost foolproof way to avoid unwanted pregnancies. And that’s been mostly true.</p>
<p>But maybe not for all women.</p>
<p>If you’re overweight or obese, <a href="http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/566330?print-article" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.newswise.com/articles/view/566330?print-article&amp;referer=');">recent studies</a> suggest that birth control pills might not be as effective for you as they are for more slender women:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“In one study of oral contraceptive pills, women with a body mass index (BMI) in the overweight range (a BMI of 25 or more) had a higher risk of pregnancy that those in the normal weight range. In another study of contraceptive skin patches, higher body weight — not higher BMI — was associated with higher risks of pregnancy.”</em></p></blockquote>
<p>In addition to the sobering news about the lessened effectiveness of hormonal birth control, these birth control methods are thought to slightly increase a woman’s risks of heart disease, high blood pressure and other conditions. When you consider that overweight and obese women are already at increased risk of heart disease, diabetes and other ills, and that pregnancy is a riskier venture, overall, for obese women and their babies, you have a new incentive for getting your weight down.</p>
<p>I know it isn’t easy. I’ve struggled with weight myself and can attest to the fact that it’s a constant battle. But it’s a battle we must fight – and win. And now, we have one more reason to do it.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-485"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/07/14/overweight-or-obese-don%e2%80%99t-count-on-your-birth-control-pills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When New Moms – or New Dads – Get the Pregnancy Blues</title>
		<link>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/05/21/when-new-moms-%e2%80%93-or-new-dads-%e2%80%93-get-the-pregnancy-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/05/21/when-new-moms-%e2%80%93-or-new-dads-%e2%80%93-get-the-pregnancy-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yvonnethornton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Childbirth & delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male post-partum depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-partum depression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pagingdrthornton.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most women are familiar with the term post-partum depression.  Start with all the stresses of adding a new member to the family – not just the financial burden, but the schedule upheaval, the sleep deprivation, and the demands of a tiny person who can only make his or her needs known by wailing. Add the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most women are familiar with the term post-partum depression.  Start with all the stresses of adding a new member to the family – not just the financial burden, but the schedule upheaval, the sleep deprivation, and the demands of a tiny person who can only make his or her needs known by wailing. Add the wild surge of hormones flooding a woman’s body, and is it any wonder that she might not be the picture of serenity and assurance? Estimates vary on the prevalence but <a href="http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/peridepsum.htm" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/peridepsum.htm?referer=');">as many as 25 percent of new moms may experience some level of depression either before or after delivery</a>.</p>
<p>That’s bad enough, but now a study suggests that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/mentalhealth/la-sci-postpartum-fathers-20100519,0,3479195.story?track=rss" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.latimes.com/features/health/mentalhealth/la-sci-postpartum-fathers-20100519_0_3479195.story?track=rss&amp;referer=');">new fathers, just like new mothers, can find themselves overwhelmed</a> when baby makes three (or more).</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Assn., found that 10.4% of men experienced serious depression at some point between his partner&#8217;s first trimester and one year after childbirth, more than double the depression rate for men in general. American men were more likely to experience prenatal or postpartum depression compared with men in other countries, 14.1% in the U.S. compared with 8.2% internationally.”</em></p></blockquote>
<p>What can you do when the guy you depend upon to keep you sane is going through his own blue period?</p>
<p>Your most important step –the one you should take if either you or your partner starts to feel sadness, agitation or hopelessness – is to talk to your doctor. Don’t try to tough it out. Reach out for help at the first signs that something isn’t quite right. It’s possible that all you need to get back to your cheery old selves is a good night’s sleep, but sometimes, you need more. The good news is that help is available. But first, you have to be aware of the <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/depression/ds00175/dsection=symptoms" target="_blank" onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mayoclinic.com/health/depression/ds00175/dsection=symptoms?referer=');">signs of depression</a>.</p>
<p>Post-partum depression can be debilitating if you let it go, so take steps immediately to get yourself and your new family back into the swing of enjoying things together again.</p>
<p><em>- Yvonne S. Thornton, MD, MPH</em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-432"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pagingdrthornton.com/2010/05/21/when-new-moms-%e2%80%93-or-new-dads-%e2%80%93-get-the-pregnancy-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

